Miles Mathis' Charge Field
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Superconducting Nanoparticles

Go down

Superconducting Nanoparticles Empty Superconducting Nanoparticles

Post by Chromium6 Sat Nov 23, 2024 12:44 am

https://pgslab.uchicago.edu/research-2/superconducting-nanoparticles/
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/nanomaterials/special_issues/superconduc_nano

Superconducting Nanoparticles

Superconductivity is a fantastic property. At some temperature, electrons flow without resistance, forever. Below the superconducting transition temperature, electrons anti-correlate strongly their motions in pairs. As a result, scattering cannot change their center of mass motion. At present the temperature of superconductors is about half way to absolute zero. This makes it difficult to use on a large scale. A long term goal of research in superconductivity is to raise the superconducting temperature to room temperature. This would have enormous practical consequences, for energy efficiency and storage.

We investigate the superconducting properties of nanostructures. As the electrons are confined is a small volume, the interaction changes. Some of the effect of confinement might help, such that having more electrons at the same energy, or the increase of the electron-phonon coupling, while others hurt such as the net decrease of the number of electrons. Our experiments are done with colloidal nanomaterials that are known to be superconductors in the bulk. For example, 16 nm diameter Pb nanoparticles exhibit the Meissner effect at a temperature similar to bulk Pb (~7K) but it subsists until ~ 100 times larger magnetic field.


TEM picture of Pb-PbSe nanoparticles

Pb-Meissner-effect

Self assembled array of Pb-PbO nanoparticles

Wikipedia:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Solids/meis.html

Miles on Meissner effect:  

NEW PAPER, added 9/19/14, Solid Light? No, just another bad interpretation of the Charge Field. I analyze the recent paper from Princeton, claiming solid light, stopped light, or blended light. In doing so, I am able to explain high-temperature superconduction mechanically, including showing the physical cause of the Meissner Effect. My analysis includes a full nuclear diagram of a Copper-Oxide ceramic, showing how charge is channeled through the architecture. This destroys BCS and RVB theory, Cooper pairs, polaritons, dimer math, and the rest of the fudged pseudo-explanations of solid-state physics.

http://milesmathis.com/solidlight.pdf

Chromium6

Posts : 828
Join date : 2019-11-29

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum