Superconducting Nanoparticles
Page 1 of 1
Superconducting Nanoparticles
https://pgslab.uchicago.edu/research-2/superconducting-nanoparticles/
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/nanomaterials/special_issues/superconduc_nano
Superconducting Nanoparticles
Superconductivity is a fantastic property. At some temperature, electrons flow without resistance, forever. Below the superconducting transition temperature, electrons anti-correlate strongly their motions in pairs. As a result, scattering cannot change their center of mass motion. At present the temperature of superconductors is about half way to absolute zero. This makes it difficult to use on a large scale. A long term goal of research in superconductivity is to raise the superconducting temperature to room temperature. This would have enormous practical consequences, for energy efficiency and storage.
We investigate the superconducting properties of nanostructures. As the electrons are confined is a small volume, the interaction changes. Some of the effect of confinement might help, such that having more electrons at the same energy, or the increase of the electron-phonon coupling, while others hurt such as the net decrease of the number of electrons. Our experiments are done with colloidal nanomaterials that are known to be superconductors in the bulk. For example, 16 nm diameter Pb nanoparticles exhibit the Meissner effect at a temperature similar to bulk Pb (~7K) but it subsists until ~ 100 times larger magnetic field.
TEM picture of Pb-PbSe nanoparticles
Pb-Meissner-effect
Self assembled array of Pb-PbO nanoparticles
Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Solids/meis.html
Miles on Meissner effect:
NEW PAPER, added 9/19/14, Solid Light? No, just another bad interpretation of the Charge Field. I analyze the recent paper from Princeton, claiming solid light, stopped light, or blended light. In doing so, I am able to explain high-temperature superconduction mechanically, including showing the physical cause of the Meissner Effect. My analysis includes a full nuclear diagram of a Copper-Oxide ceramic, showing how charge is channeled through the architecture. This destroys BCS and RVB theory, Cooper pairs, polaritons, dimer math, and the rest of the fudged pseudo-explanations of solid-state physics.
http://milesmathis.com/solidlight.pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/nanomaterials/special_issues/superconduc_nano
Superconducting Nanoparticles
Superconductivity is a fantastic property. At some temperature, electrons flow without resistance, forever. Below the superconducting transition temperature, electrons anti-correlate strongly their motions in pairs. As a result, scattering cannot change their center of mass motion. At present the temperature of superconductors is about half way to absolute zero. This makes it difficult to use on a large scale. A long term goal of research in superconductivity is to raise the superconducting temperature to room temperature. This would have enormous practical consequences, for energy efficiency and storage.
We investigate the superconducting properties of nanostructures. As the electrons are confined is a small volume, the interaction changes. Some of the effect of confinement might help, such that having more electrons at the same energy, or the increase of the electron-phonon coupling, while others hurt such as the net decrease of the number of electrons. Our experiments are done with colloidal nanomaterials that are known to be superconductors in the bulk. For example, 16 nm diameter Pb nanoparticles exhibit the Meissner effect at a temperature similar to bulk Pb (~7K) but it subsists until ~ 100 times larger magnetic field.
TEM picture of Pb-PbSe nanoparticles
Pb-Meissner-effect
Self assembled array of Pb-PbO nanoparticles
Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Solids/meis.html
Miles on Meissner effect:
NEW PAPER, added 9/19/14, Solid Light? No, just another bad interpretation of the Charge Field. I analyze the recent paper from Princeton, claiming solid light, stopped light, or blended light. In doing so, I am able to explain high-temperature superconduction mechanically, including showing the physical cause of the Meissner Effect. My analysis includes a full nuclear diagram of a Copper-Oxide ceramic, showing how charge is channeled through the architecture. This destroys BCS and RVB theory, Cooper pairs, polaritons, dimer math, and the rest of the fudged pseudo-explanations of solid-state physics.
http://milesmathis.com/solidlight.pdf
Chromium6- Posts : 828
Join date : 2019-11-29
Similar topics
» Nanoparticles remain unpredictable
» Physicists induce superconductivity in non-superconducting materials
» A sprinkle of platinum nanoparticles onto graphene makes brain probes more sensitive
» Publishing; Ice; Positrons; Heavy Elements; Superconducting Bismuth
» Condensed-matter physics: Superconducting electrons go missing
» Physicists induce superconductivity in non-superconducting materials
» A sprinkle of platinum nanoparticles onto graphene makes brain probes more sensitive
» Publishing; Ice; Positrons; Heavy Elements; Superconducting Bismuth
» Condensed-matter physics: Superconducting electrons go missing
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum