'Bizarre' Group of Distant Black Holes are Mysteriously Aligned

http://www.space.com/32549-bizarre-group-of-distant-black-holes-are-mysteriously-aligned.html
'Bizarre' Group of Distant Black Holes are Mysteriously Aligned
By Ian O'Neill, Discovery News | April 12, 2016 12:46pm ET

This is an image of the deep radio map covering the ELAIS-N1 region, with aligned galaxy jets. The image on the left has white circles around the aligned galaxies; the image on the right is without the circles. Credit: Andrew Russ Taylor

A highly sensitive radio telescope has seen something peculiar in the depths of our cosmos: A group of supermassive black holes are mysteriously aligned, as if captured in a synchronized dance.

These black holes, which occupy the centers of galaxies in a region of space called ELAIS-N1, appear to have no relation to one another, separated by millions of light-years. But after studying the radio waves generated by the twin jets blasting from the black holes' poles, astronomers using data from the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT) in India realized that all the jets were pointed in the same direction, like arrows on compasses all pointing "north."

This is the first time a group of supermassive black holes in galactic cores have been seen to share this bizarre relationship and, at first glance, the occurrence should be impossible. What we are witnessing is a cluster of galaxies, that all have central supermassive black holes that have their axes of rotation pointed in the same direction.

"Since these black holes don't know about each other, or have any way of exchanging information or influencing each other directly over such vast scales, this spin alignment must have occurred during the formation of the galaxies in the early universe," said Andrew Russ Taylor, director of the Inter-University Institute for Data Intensive Astronomy in Cape Town, South Africa. Taylor is lead author of the study published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://www.ras.org.uk/news-and-press/2816-astronomers-in-south-africa-discover-mysterious-alignment-of-black-holes

…
I’ll leave the rest. They choose to interpret these galactic alignments as remnants of the big bang.

Miles has shown us that just as atoms in a gas align to the charge field, galactic jets also align with the predominant charge field they are part of.

We are seeing the charge field structure in a field of galaxies.
.

I also posted at Thunderbolts:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=16297&p=113142#p113142

Mainstream theory is lacking an answer because it is lacking a field.

We are seeing the charge field structure in a field of galaxies.

The charge field is the source of electric currents – photons. See, The Stark Effect, a charge explanation including a new explanation of spectral lines. http://milesmathis.com/stark.pdf , Miles shows how atoms in a gas align to the charge field. The same holds for galaxies.

Charge is the structure of the universe, and since it exists everywhere, structure exists everywhere.

As for the Dark Matter possibility, quoting: http://phys.org/news/2016-04-dark-axion .
“Physicists are still struggling with the conundrum of identifying more than 80 percent of the matter in the universe. One possibility is that it is made up of extremely light particles that weigh less than a billionth of the mass of an electron.”

A photon is some 6 billion times smaller than the proton. Photons outmass visible matter (electrons and atoms) roughly 18:1. See, for example, http://milesmathis.com/nuclear.pdf. How to Build the Elements. Explaining the periodic table, with nuclear diagrams.

Dark matter, as well as all matter, is light.
.

Came across this video from Don Scott from a few years ago.
 
He points to experiments by Bostick imitating observed Space formations. Maybe this is at play:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2_H58oGHS0

.
Hi Cr6, I like Don Scott. Who wouldn't like a nice old EE?

I recently posted https://milesmathis.forumotion.com/t190-birkeland-currents Where I suggest that Miles' dismantling of Wikipedia's Birkeland Currents (BC) missed far more interesting BC belonging to Don Scott.

In EU why must every current be BC, or every energetic matter a z-pinch. Always double layers. Any talk of dark matter brings sophomoric boo's. We could have gained far more credibility by claiming photons were the source of BC.

I am surprised a post asserting charge field structure across a field of galaxies still stands in the TB EU Board; I guess all the simultaneous jets caused a BC overload.
.

LongtimeAirman wrote:.
Hi Cr6, I like Don Scott. Who wouldn't like a nice old EE?

I recently posted https://milesmathis.forumotion.com/t190-birkeland-currents Where I suggest that Miles' dismantling of Wikipedia's Birkeland Currents (BC) missed far more interesting BC belonging to Don Scott.

In EU why must every current be BC, or every energetic matter a z-pinch. Always double layers. Any talk of dark matter brings sophomoric boo's. We could have gained far more credibility by claiming photons were the source of BC.

I am surprised a post asserting charge field structure across a field of galaxies still stands in the TB EU Board; I guess all the simultaneous jets caused a BC overload.
.

Lol... I think so Airman.  Good post.  The BCs and the "string of formations" across long distances from Don Scott and TB EU folks made me think there could be a relation. There is something with this one, "string formations" that might need a second look for a good explanation in terms of Mathis?  I concur that "dark-matter" as charge and "anti-photons" are not that welcome in the TB theory. The TB camp appears deaf to Mathis and his criticisms. 

IMHO, I believe that looking at smaller scale findings will convince people better of Mathis' work than looking at the stars. Defending Quantum Theory is getting more challenging in the smaller scale than at the large scale -- electron bonding explaining it all is more tenuous as new experiments really present theoretical anomalies. Of late, it seems Mathis is focused on the smaller scales since this area is rich in anomalies.
That's my problem with the TB camp now in general they tend to mostly look at the EU and not critique QT -- even though the two are incompatible even with traditional explanations (..dark matter).  Mathis rewrites both and shows how inter-connected the large and small worlds are with the Charge Field. 

That's why I think Nevyn's and your work on the Photon Spin Mechanics is so interesting. The small world of the charge field does have to scale up "numerically" with logic and clear explanations to the inter-galactic size.

Thanks Cr6,

IMHO, I believe that looking at smaller scale findings will convince people better of Mathis' work than looking at the stars. Defending Quantum Theory is getting more challenging in the smaller scale than at the large scale -- electron bonding explaining it all is more tenuous as new experiments really present theoretical anomalies. Of late, it seems Mathis is focused on the smaller scales since this area is rich in anomalies.

On the Quantum Theory, I saw earlier today, NEW PAPER, added 5/19/16, Proof from the Mainstream of my Quantum Spin Equations. Trinity College provides us with a new experiment to analyze.
Miles shows the straightforward misapprehension of photons in general behind the latest ‘confirmation’ of QT. I agree the smaller ground is much easier to describe, defend and expand from.

Cr6 wrote:The BCs and the "string of formations" across long distances from Don Scott and TB EU folks made me think there could be a relation. There is something with this one, "string formations" that might need a second look for a good explanation in terms of Mathis?

You Sir are persistent! The way I remember it, the very first time I posted – on a comet, you suggested I look into Dr. K and his filaments, one of the six forms of matter. It just so happens we can see the chart on this site. I’d check first in Dr. László Körtvélyessy's -- Electric Universe. https://milesmathis.forumotion.com/t62-dr-laszlo-kortvelyessy-s-electric-universe.

Applying the charge field to filaments does seem the best start to start Charging Dr. K. I don’t really know enough about matter distribution between galaxies, or why exactly Dr. K sees filaments as one dimensional, but I’m willing to discuss it. Here's everything I think I know.

I agree, absolutely, that these structures exist.  I was just about to write how Jets and filaments are different and immediately convinced myself they are the same – just different points in a line, so to speak – along the charge channels between galaxies. Since I don’t recall Miles on the subject, I suppose he would say filaments are mainly photons. EU says they are plasma. It seems to me that filaments would be the two-way flow of light speed photons as well as smaller quantities many types of larger and slower particles up to electrons and protons. Don Scott mentions the concentric cylinders of Marklund currents sorting the charge material that may fit in nicely here(?) Aside from the charge photons themselves, all matter within these channels constantly recycle charge, and matter in the form of spin states, is probably created, and destroyed.

Do we have enough to start?
.