Solvay Conference on Physics (1933 and 1970) -- When Chadwick famously discovered the neutron,

Miles' work pretty much sinks the "Electron Bonding Theory" that was promoted at this 20th-century "textbook" conference.

.........
Solvay Conference on Physics (1933 and 1970)
Book page - 1 month 1 week ago
When Chadwick famously discovered the neutron,

It caused a debate that was finally more or less settled at the 7th Solvay conference in Brussels, Belgium in 1933 in favor of the neutron determined to be a fundamental particle.
The only alternative to neutrons was the existence of "nuclear electrons" which would counteract some of the proton charges in the nucleus, since by then it was known that nuclei had about twice the mass that could be accounted for if they were simply assembled from hydrogen nuclei (protons). But how these nuclear electrons could be trapped in the nucleus, was a mystery.
This is when and where it was decided....... that the neutron is not a combination of a proton and a electron but rather a fundamental particle without an electrostatic charge, meaning it is neutral, hence the name Neutron.

A group of scientists

participated in the 7th Solvay Conference, Bruxelles (October 1933). Seated (left to right): Erwin Schrödinger, Irène Joliot, Niels Henrik David Bohr, Abram Ioffe, Marie Curie, Paul Langevin, Owen Willans Richardson, Lord Ernest Rutherford, Théophile de Donder, Maurice de Broglie, Louis de Broglie, Lise Meitner, James Chadwick. Standing (left to right): Émile Henriot, Francis Perrin, Frédéric Joliot, Werner Heisenberg, Hendrik Anthony Kramers, E. Stahel, Enrico Fermi, Ernest Thomas Sinton Walton, Paul Dirac, Peter Joseph William Debye, Nevill Francis Mott, Blas Cabrera, George Gamow, Walther Bothe, Patrick Blackett, M.S. Rosenblum, Jacques Errera, Ed. Bauer, Wolfgang Pauli, Jules-Émile Verschaffelt, M. Cosyns, E. Herzen, John Douglas Cockcroft, Charles Drummond Ellis, Rudolf Peierls, Auguste Piccard, Ernest O. Lawrence, Léon Rosenfeld. Absents: Albert Einstein and Charles Eugène Guye



1933 Solvay Conference

The second conference

dealing with the structure of the nucleus has been the 15th Solvay conference, Symmetry Properties of Nuclei.

This conference has been dealing with the internal structure of the nucleus of the atom. It describes how the notion of an geometric structure exists within the nucleus of the atom. The helium nucleus or Alpha particle is seen as a tetrahedron. Then the bigger elements are seen as groupings of the alpha particle as is depicted here.

The shape we see here has the dots as alpha particles and there are 5 of them grouped into a tetrahedral bi-pyramid structure representing Neon.

Various models are debated based upon this notion.
From the introduction of the proceedings:

"..... The nucleus 8Be is not quite stable and decays into two alpha particles with a Q-value of 94 KeV. The neighboring nucleus 9Be is stable in its ground state; but its energy of dissociation into alpha + alpha + n is only 1.5 MeV. These experimental facts suggest that 8Be might consist of two alpha particles interacting by a force which is just too weak to bind them; and that 9Be consists of two alpha particles bound together by an extra neutron.

Certain excited stated of 16O have large reduced widths for decaying into 12C + alpha. These states might consist of an alpha particle bound to a 12C-nucleus by some mutual interaction. in 12C the twelve nucleons might be grouped together into three alpha clusters, and the nucleus 6Li could consist of a deuteron bound to an alpha particle. these are examples of some cluster structures which could exist in light nuclei."

Miles:
--------------

Pilot Waves? No. Charge
by Miles Mathis

To see this, we will look at pilot wave theory, Bohm theory, Bell theory, and finally Valentini theory. Pilot wave theory comes from de Broglie in 1927. At the Solvay conference of that year, de Broglie proposed that waves in the medium “piloted” quantum particles from place to place, explaining the wave-particle duality by giving real characteristics to both particle and wave. Pauli and von Neumann both attacked de Broglie, Pauli regarding the action of the wave in inelastic scattering (collision), and von Neumann on mathematical grounds. De Broglie also had the misfortune to be working with Born, who helped convince him mechanical explanations were not the way to go in the new physics. So de Broglie gave up on his theory, just as Maxwell had given up on vortices and Newton had given up on spinning corpuscles. As Newton had been diverted into cloaking math by the criticisms of Huygens and Hooke, and as Maxwell had been diverted into quaternions by criticisms of Kelvin, de Broglie was diverted into mathematical formalisms by Born, Pauli and the rest.

http://milesmathis.com/pilot.pdf